FROM VANGUARD WEB PAGESummer 1999 Overview
Risk Measures Can Help You Evaluate a Fund
During the past five years, the Wilshire 5000 Equity Index a benchmark for the entire U.S. stock market recorded a total return of nearly 200%, tripling the value of each dollar invested in such a basket of stocks.
In an extraordinary bull market like this, dazzling rewards can, however, obscure the other side of investing: risk. During the past year though, risk made some notable appearances: Stock prices plummeted in summer 1998, and bond prices fell sharply this spring as interest rates rose.
You can't escape risk, but you can temper it through diversification and portfolio balance. You can also measure it.
Risk measures can help you to decide whether a mutual fund is appropriate for your temperament, time horizon, and investment goals. This article examines several risk measures, including two -- beta and R-squared -- that our Funds Directory provides for individual Vanguard stock funds. The jargon of risk measurement may be forbidding, but the concepts are simple.
Beta. Beta measures whether a fund tends to rise and fall as much as the market. For stock funds, beta is generally measured relative to the S&Pr 500 Index; for most bond funds, the benchmark is the Lehman Brothersr Aggregate Bond Index. By definition, the beta of the market index is 1.00. A fund with a beta of 1.50, for example, is significantly more volatile than its benchmark. It would tend to gain 1.5% for every 1% rise in the market, and lose 1.5% for every 1% decline in the market. On the other hand, a fund with a beta of 0.50 is notably less volatile than its benchmark.No One Measure Tells AllR-squared. R-squared captures the degree to which fund returns go up and down at the same time as the market. An R-squared of 0 means that a fund's returns have no correlation with a benchmark's fluctuations; an R-squared of 1.00 indicates that a fund's returns are completely in sync_up and down_with the benchmark. An R-squared of less than 0.70 suggests a low correlation between a fund and its benchmark index. R-squared also provides a context for beta. Simply put, beta may not mean much if the R-squared is low. For example, Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals Fund has a relatively low beta of 0.79, but the fund is hardly a low-risk investment. The fund's R-squared of 0.14 reveals that its returns are weakly correlated with those of the S&P 500 Index, so its beta versus a broad index tells you little about its volatility.
Standard deviation. This statistic compares a fund not with a benchmark, but with its own past record. Standard deviation is the degree to which a fund's returns have fluctuated above or below its mean, or average, return over the previous 36 months. Suppose, for example, that Fund A posts annual returns of -5%, +10%, and +25%. Over the three years, it earns an average annual return of +10%, with a standard deviation of 15. Fund B returns +5%, +10%, and +15%. It too earns an average return of +10%, but its standard deviation is just 5. So, Fund A has been three times as volatile as Fund B.
All risk measures have limitations. First, they're based on past performance. Jeffrey S. Molitor, Vanguard Principal and Director of Portfolio Review, explains that "there is some stability in risk measures over time, but funds can change their character. The past three years may not be indicative of the next three."
Second, no single measure paints a complete picture of risk. Mr. Molitor cautions that "R-squared and beta allow you to evaluate funds against a common benchmark, but they should not be used to the exclusion of other measures. Investors should consider qualitative risk factors such as investment style and portfolio concentration."
Finally, statistics don't capture the potential consequence of risk: loss. To assess that potential, review a fund's annual returns, preferably for a long period. In 1994, Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals Fund gained +89.2%. A year later, it declined -19.2%. These figures make clear something the risk measures only suggest: Vanguard Gold and Precious Metals Fund can be extremely volatile, and like all stock funds, it can lose money.