HOME

Business Organizations



Previous Outline

Next Outline

 

 

Outline

  • Rule 10b-5  - implied private cause of action 
    • federal suit advantages 
    • standing:  purchasers and sellers 
    • fraud action:  not unfairness or mismanagement 
  • Federal fraud action - elements 
    • misrepresentation or misleading omission of material fact 
      • Substantial likelihood reasonable shareholder would consider important 
      • Probability plus magnitude 
    • defendant's scienter 
      • Negligence not enough 
      • knowledge or recklessness 
    • plaintiff's reliance 
    • cause of plaintiff's loss 
    • damages

Daily Thoughts

 

Problems

One fall morning the CEOs of Mega Corp. and Target Ltd. sit down for a power breakfast at a swank New York hotel.  The two agree that it "would be of mutual interest" if the companies were to combine.  The CEOs talk to their boards, which authorize the exchange of proprietary information and the hiring of investment bankers to advise the companies on a possible deal.  Target's publicly-traded stock begins to act erratically.  So a Wall Street Journal reporter calls Target's CEO and asks her, "Can you confirm the rumors that merger discussions are underway."  The CEO says, “I’m not in a position to confirm or deny any rumors.  Maybe you should do your homework.”

Party A (shareholders) Argue that the CEO has violated Rule 10b-5.  What are the liability implications.

Party B (management)  Argue the CEO did not violate Rule 10b-5. 

Readings