ECN 271: Theory of Social Choice
Spring 2008
Dr. Jac Heckelman
Carswell 110
x5923
heckeljc@wfu.edu
http:\\www.wfu.edu\~heckeljc\jac.htm

Social choice theory focuses mainly on the incentives voters face under alternative voting arrangements. When individuals form groups, conflicts naturally occur, and decisions must be reached as to how these conflicts will be resolved. In a democratic environment, voting is the main avenue for deciding how to proceed. The issues may involve selecting representatives or specific proposals. But if the entire group cannot agree, how should consensus be determined?

In this course, the implications of various voting rules will be considered both in terms of individual voting incentives and aggregation to group decisions. Social choice analysis is designed to determine how well a given voting rule will lead to outcomes which best represent the desires of the group members. However, group members as voters may not reveal their true preferences if they determine that voting differently would better their chance for a more preferred outcome. Voting rules will therefore be considered for their impact on voting incentives, by making comparisons under “sincere” versus “strategic” voting.

TEXTS

EXAMS

PAPER (20%)

HOMEWORK AND PARTICIPATION (10%)

READING SCHEDULE

1. Introduction

  • Hinich and Munger, ch 1
  • Johnson, “Constitutional Economics” {1/24}
  • Dahl, “Majority Rule and the Democratic Process” {1/29}
  • 2. Median Voter Spatial Models

  • Hinich and Munger, ch 2-3 (skip pp.55-61)
  • Fiorina, “Do Voters Choose Divided Government?” {2/7}
  • 3. Strategic Voting

  • Taylor, ch 1, pp. 1-10
  • Hinich and Munger, ch 8, pp.157-166
  • Dixit and Nalebuff, “The Strategy of Voting”{2/19}
  • EXAM 1 (sections 1-3) {2/21}


    4. Alternative Voting Procedures

  • Hinich and Munger, ch 5, pp: 99-112
  • Taylor, ch 5
  • Brams and Fishburn, “The Mixed Success of Approval Voting” {3/4}
  • Mueller, “Probabilistic Majority Rule” {3/6}

  • 5. Impossibility Theorems

  • Hinich and Munger, ch 5, pp: 90-99
  • Taylor, ch 10
  • Hammond, “Rank Injustice?” {3/20}
  • Bonner, “Liberty and Welfare” {3/25}
  • EXAM 2 (sections 4-5) {4/8}


    6. The Calculus of Voting

  • Hinich and Munger, ch 7
  • Taylor, ch 2
  • Heckelman, “Bribing Voters Without Verification“
  • FINAL EXAM - May 3, 9am (sections 1-6)