Boston and Cambridge

City Hall

This page illustrates some of the ways social structures and political systems are expressed in architecture. In the eighteenth century when New England was a farmer, merchant, and artisan democracy, it used Faneuil Hall (top) for town meetings. This plain red-brick Georgian building was where male citizens engaged in face-to-face political debate and action. By the late-nineteenth century, in the aftermath of industrial revolution and Civil War, New England was divided into distinct social classes. And Boston's governing assembly moved into this French style, Second Empire, City Hall (middle). This is an architecture of cohesive upper-class rule by wealthy Boston Brahmins. They embraced an ethos of European-styled cultural superiority of the sort captured by novelists Edith Wharton and Henry James. The life span of this fusion between class rule and cultural hierarchy was between 1870 and 1920. Finally, Government Center (bottom), the modernist cement building, is the architecture of a post-industrial society run by managerial elites. This reflects a period (1950s to the present) of admnistration by white-collar, computer-literate bureaucrats without an aptitude for direct democracy or a taste for aesthetics. Faneuil Hall
Faneuil Hall
           
           
City Hall
City Hall
           
           
Government Center
Government Center


Yale University Library and Sociology Department. The Social Life of Cities.
This Page Last Modified: February 7, 1997
Copyright 1996-97, Yale University. All rights reserved.

URL is http://www.yale.edu/socdept/slc