|
Peruvian Japanese Internment
|
|
|
What Happened to the Peruvian Japanese After the War After the war ended, the major problem facing the American
government was what to do with the Peruvian Japanese. The Peruvian government
did not want the Japanese to be returned and the American government did
not necessarily want them either. The American government was unsure of
what to do with the internees. At first, the American government made
plans for many of the Japanese to be sent to Japan, but many of the Peruvian
Japanese did not want to go to Japan. Attorney Wayne M. Collins protected
many of the Peruvian Japanese from being deported to Japan or sent back
to Peru if that was not what they wanted. Many of the families were eventually
shipped to towns across America where arrangements were made with companies
in the towns so that the Japanese would work for them. A major concentration
of Peruvian Japanese went to Seabrook Farms in Bridgeton, NJ. This was
the town where my family was located after the war and is the town that
my grandmother still resides today.
Receiving Reparations In the 1980's, when congress was negotiating reparations for the Japanese Americans who had been interned, congress was not considering giving reparations for the Peruvian Japanese internees. The Peruvian Japanese in America felt that this was unfair, because they had suffered the same injustice as the Japanese Americans. The Peruvian Japanese argued with congress that they should also receive reparations, which is the reason why my grandfather told the testimonial of his experience before congress. In the end, the Japanese Americans received a reparation of $20,000 and the Peruvian Japanese received a reparation of $5,000. Closing Thoughts
|
|
|
This exhibit was researched and designed by Alexis Frances Murono. Background: (www.usdoj.gov/kidspage/ crt/redress.htm) |
|
|
This exhibit and museum were created during an introductory seminar on the Asia-Pacific War, taught at Wake Forest University during the spring semester 2002. The material and opinions are those of their respective authors and do not represent the views of the University or the Department of History.
|
|