A Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed
Bethany Square Development Area in Bethania:
A Historic District in Forsyth County,
North Carolina

by
Bruce S. Idol
Roger W. Kirchen
Stephen T. Trage

Wake Forest Archeology Laboratories
J. Ned Woodall, Principal Investigator

Report Submitted to Kenabeck Builders and the
City/County Planning Board of Forsyth County
October, 1996

Table of Contents

  1. Abstract
  2. Acknowledgements
  3. Introduction
  4. Management Summary
  5. Project Area
    1. Geology
    2. Soils
    3. Climate
    4. Flora
    5. Fauna
  6. Background Research
    1. Prehistoric Overview
    2. Historic Overview
    3. Previous Archeological Research
  7. Research Methods
  8. Results of Survey
    1. Archeological Stratigraphy
    2. The Stauber House (NC Site #31Fy1031**)
  9. Summary and Recommendations
  10. References Cited
  11. Appendix - Artifact Inventory

Abstract

A Phase I cultural resources survey was performed by personnel from the Wake Forest Archeology Laboratories in an area to be affected by residential construction within the Bethania Historic District, Forsyth County, North Carolina. The cultural resources survey documented the existence of an extensive scatter of cultural materials within the former orchard and upland lots of the original Bethania settlement. The architectural ruins of the late nineteenth century Stauber House (NC Site # 31Fy1031**) were documented, as well as the existence of old field/property boundaries in the form of low berms. No prehistoric artifacts were recovered during the survey. The above-ground ruins of the Stauber House have been redeposited, although some sub-surface structural elements may remain undetected. The intact remains of a fieldstone pathway or yard area were documented by the survey. A possible buried horizon was encountered approximately 40 meters from the presumed house location, but further shovel tests revealed that this deposit was not extensive. The Stauber House is a potential contributing element under Criterion A and D of the Bethania National Register Nomination as a Historic District, and additional archeological and archival research are required to assess this potential. In the absence of further archeological investigations, it is recommended that heavy earth-moving and other destructive construction activities be avoided in the area of the Stauber House.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Andrea Armstrong, of the City/County Planning Board of Forsyth County who provided information and maps of the project area. Michael Hartley, of Old Salem Inc., generously provided maps and shared his extensive knowledge of Bethania's past. Herman and Peggy Stoltz of Bethania provided information concerning the past uses of the project area land. We would also like to thank Dan Dockery of Kenabeck Builders for his interest and assistance during the project. At the Wake Forest Archeology Laboratories, Dana Ivey assisted with artifact processing and Bill Terrell examined faunal material recovered during the survey. Bruce Idol Roger Kirchen Steve Trage Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories October, 1996

Introduction

This report details the results of a cultural resources inventory of a 10 acre tract slated for development within the Historic District of Bethania, Forsyth County, North Carolina. The survey of the property was performed from September 13 - October 3, 1996 by personnel from the Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories. Almost all of the project area is located within the expanded Bethania Historic District (Hartley et al. 1990). The purpose of this survey was to inventory the area for cultural features of possible contributing significance to the Historic District. The survey of this tract was accomplished by subsurface testing at 20 meter intervals in all areas lacking evidence of prior disturbance, and pedestrian surface survey. Since the entire survey area exhibited less than 40% surface visibility, test pits were used throughout the survey tract, and supplemented in some areas by surface inspection. The survey revealed a light subsurface scatter of nineteenth and twentieth century artifacts, reflecting the casual accumulation of debris generated by the nearby residential lots. No structural remains were observed in the area. The only cultural features observed were two intersecting "berms" or old fence boundaries. The remains of a late nineteenth century house structure (the Stauber House, NC Site # 31Fy1031**), which was destroyed in the late 1930's, were found in the southwest corner of the project area. Only two undisturbed architectural elements related to the house were observed; the site exists mainly in the form of archeological remains. Historic artifacts from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries are abundant from test pits in the structure area. Intact subsurface structural remains observed included a stone slab walkway or yard area and an iron pipe protruding from an eroded bank and encountered below the surface in a shovel test pit. Although above ground remains of the house have been mechanically redeposited at some time in the past, intact and undisturbed subsurface remains may exist. Additional testing would be required to assess the Stauber House site as a contributing resource under Criterion D of Bethania's National Register Nomination. Historic period artifacts were present in most shovel test pits in the eastern half of the project area's main tract. These do not appear to be associated with any previously existing structures in the area, but instead reflect the casual disposal and spread of domestic and construction debris from nearby residential lots and occupation of the Stauber House during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. These artifact scatters were not treated as individual sites in the field, and were not assigned site numbers.

Management Summary

An intensive cultural resources survey was conducted at the proposed Bethany Square Development tract in Bethania, Forsyth County, North Carolina, by the Wake Forest Archeology Laboratories for Kenabeck Builders. The survey recovered a total of 308 historic period artifacts, documented the presence of old fence/property lines, and located the remains of the late nineteenth century Stauber House. No standing structures exist within the project area. The two berms may mark old upland lot property/field boundaries, and are potentially contributing resources under the National Register form of Bethania, which includes features of the landscape as significant. These features will likely be destroyed by the construction of a permanent access road to the center of the proposed residential area. Although Criterion D of the National Register of Historic Places applies, the archeological study of a similar feature in Forsyth County (see below) indicates that no significant new information would be gained from further archeological study of the berms. No additional archeological work is recommended for that area. The Stauber House site is a potential contributing resource under Criterion A and D of the Bethania National Register form, which establishes a period of significance from 1759 - 1940. The Stauber House potentially falls under the Community Planning and Development criteria for significance, although more archeological work supplemented by archival research is required to properly judge the potential for the Stauber House as a contributing resource. More extensive sub-surface testing would be required to further assess the presence of subsurface structural (e.g., a cellar) or other cultural features. In the absence of further archeological research to mitigate destructive effects of construction, it is recommended that the area be excluded from any major earth-moving or other intrusive construction activities. The area lies within a designated open area as shown on the map provided by Kenabeck Builders, so avoidance may be an appropriate treatment. It is also recommended that the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer be consulted by local County government to guide the efforts of preservation or mitigation of unavoidable adverse effects.

Project Area

The project area consists of a 10 acre tract just west of and adjacent to Main Street (NC 65, Bethania Tobaccoville Road), and bounded to the south by Loesch's Lane, within historic Bethania, Forsyth County, North Carolina. This area will be adversely affected in the near future by the construction of a housing development, Bethany Square. The survey area includes a road and water access corridor from Main Street and a 30 foot (9 meter) buffer zone around areas which will be directly affected by construction. The tract is presently surrounded by private residential lands.

Geology

Forsyth County is situated within the Piedmont physiographic province of northwest North Carolina, bounded by the fall line and coastal plain to the east and by the Blue Ridge scarp to the west. The Piedmont Plateau, a broad physiographic zone, stretches from Alabama to New Jersey. The Piedmont is characterized by rolling topography created by erosion and its features include rounded hills, long, low ridges, gently sloping valleys, and graded streams. Elevations in Forsyth County range from less than 213 meters (700 feet) along the Yadkin River floodplain to 337 meters (1, 105 feet) near Rural Hall (Zimmerman 1976:62). The elevation range for the project area is 247 - 258 meters (812 - 848 feet) above sea level. The project area lies within the northern edge of the Charlotte Belt, and is underlain by igneous rocks dating from the Pennsylvanian to the Permian period which are intrusive into the surrounding metamorphic rocks. Muddy Creek is less than 600 meters to the west, and the Yadkin River is approximately 40 kilometers to the west.

Soils

The majority of the survey area consists of Hiwassee clay loam (6-10 percent slopes). This upland soil is generally well-drained, acidic, and is well-suited to pasture or trees (Zimmerman 1976:13- 14). Soil in the northern portion of the survey tract is heavily eroded (see "Results of Survey" section).

Climate

The climate of Forsyth County is temperate, and is characterized by warm, humid summers and mild winters. The county averages 200 frost-free days a year, and there are no distinct wet or dry seasons (Zimmerman 1976:62).

Flora

The project area and Forsyth County supported diverse hardwood forests (dominated by oak/hickory primary forest) before the arrival of Europeans. Today, approximately two-thirds of the surveyed area is forested with either secondary growth hardwoods, pine, and dense cedar stands. The other third is covered with early successional growth, including young hickory, blackberry, greenbriar, poison oak, honeysuckle, and grass. Most of the project area was cultivated, in orchard, or in pasture throughout this century. As recently as 15 years ago parts of the property were used for growing hay (Herman Stoltz, personal communication 1996).

Fauna

Major mammalian game species in the area would have included white-tailed deer, black bear, squirrels, and rabbit. Wild turkey would have likely been abundant in the past, and local streams would have been a source of freshwater fish. Forsyth County is not situated on any major migratory bird flyways.

Background Research

Prehistoric Overview

The North Carolina Piedmont has been inhabited for around 12,000 years before present, by native groups who witnessed great ecological and social changes during this lengthy period. This vast period of time is typically divided by archeologists into four broad cultural/temporal periods for the Southeast: Paleoindian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippian. PaleoIndian Period (ca. 12,000- 10000 BP) This period is represented by a continent wide distribution of fluted, lanceolate projectile points (Clovis) associated west of the Mississippi with extinct migratory Pleistocene megafauna. Paleoindian groups are presumed to have been small, highly mobile hunters and foragers with highly curated tool kits manufactured from high-quality lithic resources (Meltzer and Smith 1986). Paleoindian occupations from the Southeast are known primarily from surface scatters and isolated finds. Over time, fluted points gradually reduced in size and basal thinning replaced true fluting. In North Carolina, terminal Paleoindian points are represented by Hardaway/Dalton projectile point forms, which are thin triangular bifaces with deeply concave bases and shallow side-notching (Coe 1964:64). Archaic Period (ca. 10,000- 2500BP) The Archaic period is characterized by increasingly localized adaptations (evinced by a greater diversity of projectile point forms and site sizes) to modern Holocene climatic conditions and associated floral and faunal resources, increased use of riverine and plant resources, increased population in some areas, the use of ground stone tools, and widespread exchange networks. The Early Archaic period (ca. 10,000-8,000BP) sees a continuation of the previous pattern of small, dispersed, upland and lowland sites. Palmer and Kirk projectile point forms are considered diagnostic of this period. No substantial evidence exists to indicate that the pattern of upland Archaic sites within Forsyth County was any different from any other county within the northwestern Piedmont Plateau. The Middle Archaic (ca. 8,000-5,500 BP) is distinguished from the preceding period by the increasing presence of ground stone tools and greater diversity of bifacial point forms. The climatic event known as the Hypsithermal occurred during this interval, ushering in drier and warmer conditions, and lowering the gradient of Southeastern rivers. The availability of floodplain resources resulted in some population concentrates, exploiting in part abundant shellfish and plant resources. In North Carolina, diagnostic forms include Stanly, Morrow Mountain, Halifax, and Guilford types. The Late Archaic in North Carolina (ca. 5,500-2,500 BP) is characterized by great diversity in lithic raw material used for stone tools and the use of steatite containers for processing plant foods. The Savannah River point is the most diagnostic point form, followed by the terminal Archaic Gypsy point. Within the Southeastern region as a whole, several important changes in subsistence and settlement patterns developed during the middle to late Archaic, most notably the cultivation of wild plant foods along river bottoms. Domesticated plants appear to have been introduced later, and were grafted on to existing (i.e. Archaic) subsistence regimes (Smith 1992). Along the coasts of South Carolina and Georgia, pottery tempered with plant fibers began to be used ca. 4500 BP. Woodland Period (ca. 2,500-250 BP) This period is distinguished from the preceding Archaic period by the use of ceramic containers for processing food. The early Woodland in North Carolina (ca. 2,500- 1,500 BP) is indistinguishable from the preceding period in terms of settlement and subsistence patterns. The earliest pottery bearing sites have yielded dates of 240 B.C. +/- 95 (Claggett and Cable 1982) and, in Forsyth County, 266 B.C. +/- 80 (Davis 1987). Pottery from this period is generally sand or quartz tempered with relatively thin walls and smoothed interiors, and impressed with a cord-wrapped paddle or wicker-like fabric. During this period small triangular projectile points began to be used, likely coinciding with the adoption of the bow and arrow (Coe 1964). The middle Woodland (ca. 1,500-1,000 BP) period is roughly delineated from the previous period by the use of thick-walled quartz tempered fabric, cord, and net-impressed pottery. Sites occur largely in river floodplains and tend to be large when found, although they are much more infrequent than late Woodland sites. There is little evidence for the use of domesticated tropical cultigens during this period; instead, the traditional pattern of exploiting primarily upland resources continued supplemented by maize and other seed plants. The late Woodland period in the North Carolina Piedmont (ca. 1,000-250 BP) is characterized by more numerous floodplain sites probably indexing an increasing, more sedentary population, focused around maize agriculture, but continuing to rely heavily on forest resources. Late Woodland sites in the Piedmont are typified by circular habitation structures, net-impressed pottery, subsurface storage pits, and flexed burials in oval pits. The late prehistoric period in the North Carolina Piedmont continues the Woodland pattern until the Contact period. Cultural elements associated with the Mississippian do not appear in the central-western Piedmont zone. The Woodland terminates ca. AD 1700 when the introduction of European diseases such as smallpox and measles effectively destroyed native populations in the Piedmont.

Historic Overview

The village of Bethania was the first planned Moravian settlement in Wachovia to be constructed, and was intended as an agricultural (town lot) community of the central town of Salem (Hartley 1987:78). Concerned that a growing Bethabara would rival Salem, the planned center of Wachovia, Bishop Spangenburg ordered the construction of Bethania, which would receive personnel funneled from Bethabara. Upon witnessing the consequences of Indian raids in the region during the French and Indian War, Spangenburg decided that the new town of Bethania would be too small to defend itself. However, the numerous non-Moravian refugees which were being housed near the Bethabara mill provided a supplementary population, and Spangenberg decided to send selected groups of these dislocated people along with Moravian settlers to inhabit Bethania. Admission to the settlement of Bethania remained carefully controlled, although its members were not members of the Oeconomy. Bethania was governed directly by Bethabara until 1762, when the Bethania Committee was formed to help handle certain secular matters (Thorp 1989: 46, 47,97). Gottlieb Reuter surveyed the location in 1759, and the settlement, layed out on the upland north of the Black Walnut Bottom, mirrored the compact, linear villages popular in Central Europe during the Middle Ages and more recently during the 18th century Prussian expansion. Of the two types of German linear villages, Bethania was the street type... "Street villages consisted of homes on roughly equal-size lots lining a street or road. Immediately adjacent to the house lots were garden plots and beyond those were large common fields. Some of the common fields were divided into strips on which families raised grain, and others served as communal pasture or woodland for the villagers" (Thorp 1986:26). The orchard lots which surrounded the residential lots in Bethania were used for a variety of activities related to the functioning of the community. This included use for garden plots, farm animals, and outbuildings of several types, as well as the cultivation of fruit trees. The abundant upland lots were either cultivated or pasture areas, or were left in timber and used for wood. Fences, tree lines, and cultivation patterns reflect the past upland lot boundaries today (Hartley et al. 1990). The project area lies almost entirely within the orchard and upland lot areas of the original settlement. Bethania was the only Moravian agricultural community which strictly adhered to this centralized European settlement model, and is unique in colonial North Carolina. Subsequent Moravian towns like Friedberg, Friedland, and Hope adopted a more dispersed, Anglo-American form of settlement (Thorp 1986:30, 35-36). Bethania lay four miles from Bethabara, and was connected by a road to the founder community. Isolated European homesteads were plentiful in the area of Wachovia, but the large tracts held by these settlers remained largely undeveloped and uncultivated, and were linked by no large, central towns. Although Bethania was primarily an agricultural town, it was able to provide most of its own goods and services within a few years of its founding (Hartley et al. 1990). In 1781, the British army under Cornwallis stayed in Bethania during its pursuit of General Greene. In 1854, Bethania was linked by a plank road with larger towns to the east (Eller 1959:20-21). By the latter part of the nineteenth century, the town was undergoing the same processes of industrialization as the rest of the state (Shirley 1994; Fries et al. 1976). Operating businesses by 1896 included a blacksmith and wheelwright establishment, a tannery, a wagon works, a flour and corn mill, and a combination general store and tobacco manufactory (Taylor 1981:45). In addition to Bethania Moravian church, Bethania AME Zion, the second church for the African-American congregation, was built by 1893. Michael Hartley (personal communication, September, 1996) reports the prior existence of slave quarters within the current project area. Slaves were kept at Bethania, as they were at other Moravian communities in North Carolina. In the twentieth century, Bethania was increasingly influenced by surrounding urbanized areas. Urban sprawl in the direction of Bethania and increased traffic flow (North Carolina Department of Transportation 1990) constitutes the major threat to the town's integrity, although Bethania has managed to fend off efforts to locate a highway corridor through the vicinity. Modern construction and the need to alleviate the traffic problem pose the primary threat to undocumented archeological sites. Bethania today is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, as a 2500 acre Historic District.

Previous Archeological Research

Extensive archeological research has taken place within Forsyth County during the past three decades, including large scale floodplain and upland research-oriented surveys by Wake Forest University and numerous federally-mandated compliance projects which have inventoried a large number of prehistoric and historic sites within the county. Most of these surveys have been concentrated along the Yadkin River floodplain and major tributaries (e.g. Woodall and Claggett 1974; Woodall 1975; Russell 1982; Abbott 1983,1987; Davis and Marshall 1988). Archeological sites in upland settings have also been investigated in non-compliance research projects (e.g. Beckerman 1983) and cultural resource management studies (Ward 1976; Webb 1994). Recorded archeological sites in the Bethania vicinity include 31Fy183, a rather large Archaic - Woodland period site with intact cultural deposits on the floodplain of Muddy Creek to the west; 31Fy752, another Woodland period site (Abbott 1984); and 31Fy571, a historic structure dating from the nineteenth through early twentieth century overlooking Muddy Creek to the south of Bethania (Davis and Marshall 1988:26). The Moravian occupation of Forsyth County has been the subject of extensive archeological research, most notably South's (1972) inaugural excavations at the site of Bethabara in the 1960's, and subsequent investigations by John Clauser (Clauser 1978;1988;1994) and others. Compliance projects in the vicinity of the Moravian communities of Bethabara and Friedburg have been conducted in recent years (e.g. Willis and Marshall 1988; Keller 1989; Webb 1994). In Bethania itself, Michael Hartley has partially excavated the site of the 1765 tavern, which lies near the project area at the intersection of Main Street and Loesch's Lane. An archeological study was also performed in 1993 to mitigate the effects of improvement of Loesch's Lane. Three archeological features dating to the nineteenth and early twentieth century were recorded, including a coal midden (Joy 1993).

Research Methods

Because surface visibility for the entire project area was less than 40 percent, and all slopes were less than 15 degrees, subsurface testing in the form of systematic shovel pits was performed to detect cultural deposits. These shovel tests were placed on transect lines oriented with compass directions. Transects were spaced 20 meters apart and a twenty meter interval between shovel tests was maintained. Each shovel test was excavated through the A-horizon (if present) and at least 5 cm into subsoil. The walls and bottom of each shovel test were inspected for signs of cultural deposits or materials, and removed soil was passed through 1/4 inch hardware cloth to recover any artifacts. Shovel tests were described by depth, stratigraphy, artifacts present, and soil texture and Munsell color. Artifacts recovered were placed in sealable plastic bags and labeled with provenience information before transport back to the lab. Previous machine excavated test trenches in the area were inspected for cultural deposits and materials. In some instances, additional test pits were excavated at 10 meter individuals in cardinal directions from a test pit which contained artifacts to assess a possible subsurface deposit or better define the limits and density of an artifact scatter. This was not done generally because it was believed that most of the survey area contained low densities of historic artifacts of some kind due to casual disposal during the lengthy occupation of the property and surrounding areas, and that additional shovel tests would only result in a larger artifact sample rather than assess the true size of any particular site (the entire area contains archeological remains, and could be defined as a site). All artifacts, at the time of this writing, and attendant documentation are curated at the Wake Forest Archeology Laboratory.

Results of Survey

Stratigraphy

Archeological survey of the project area documented an extensive scatter of nineteenth and twentieth century European cultural materials, attesting to the duration of Euro-american occupation in the area. These materials were confined to the southern half of the main project area block, and the smaller block to the east which fronts Main Street. Again, the southern half of the project area main block and the smaller block to the east lie almost entirely within the orchard and upland lot areas of the original Bethania settlement. Most soil in the northern portion of the survey area was eroded to the red-orange (5 YR 4/6) clay (C horizon). This area was covered with dense secondary growth cedar and pine, which postdate the prior excavation of backhoe test trenches in the northern half of the project area. The thick B horizon (0-70+ cm) encountered in the center of the project area's main block may be partially the consequence of colluvial wash originating upslope in the northwestern sector, although this soil zone is mainly a primary deposit. One test pit from this area (C-10) encountered artifacts (redware sherdlets) between 0-44 and 44-54 cm below surface. Only slight to moderate textural changes were noticed from test pits of this area, and no test pit from this zone encountered red-orange clayey subsoil. The southern half of the main block area possessed a fairly uniform deposit of brown clayey loam (5 YR 3/3), usually around 30 cm thick with abundant nineteenth and twentieth century artifacts, overlying red brown loamy clay (5 YR 4/4/) subsoil. Some of these artifacts are apparently associated with the ruins of the Stauber House in the southwestern corner of the main block (see below). Other artifacts may be attributed to previous structures in the area, but also may be the result of secondary disposal processes originating generally from the town lot area. Only one test pit (E-3) encountered evidence of a buried, organically rich horizon within this area, appearing as a faintly dark, 6 cm thick streak. No artifacts were encountered within this zone, with the exception of an animal bone fragment and charcoal. Test pits excavated within 10 meters from the original failed to encounter this horizon. No plow marks were noticed within any of the test pits, although they could easily have been missed due to the small size of the excavated units. The stratigraphic sequence from the smaller block to the east fronting Main Street is characterized by an undifferentiated layer of dark reddish brown (5 YR 3/2 and 3/4) clayey loam overlying a brownish red (5 YR 4/6) loamy clay subsoil. The depth of the brown loam layer varied widely, between 7 and 24 cm. Artifacts were encountered in most test pits from the southern half of this area. Most of these were nineteenth century ceramic potsherds, especially glazed redware. One salt-glazed stoneware sherd was also encountered in this area, and late nineteenth- twentieth century clear-glazed white earthenware sherds also were present. Other artifacts from this area included fragments of nails, window pane, and brick. The downslope area of the smaller block (to the west) possessed a thick deposit (20 cm) of red clay colluvium. There was no brown loam layer underlying the colluvial wash, and this area may have been disturbed in the past. Only one artifact was encountered in this portion- a large glazed white earthenware sherd was found within the colluvial layer. An old fence line, represented by a low, undulating earthen "berm" approximately 36 meters long and no more than 20 cm high was encountered along the western edge of a pronounced slope in this zone, oriented north/south. A single standing post remained along the top of this feature with barbed wire attached, and several large stones were present along the top and outer edge of the berm itself. This line was intersected by a similar earthen feature approximately 44 meters long and oriented east/west, which was wider and possessed greater relief. A decayed wooden post similar in form to the one on the north-south berm lay atop the east-west berm, and it too had attached barbed wire. The two berms probably are contemporaneous and mark former upland property lines. A similar feature exists around the perimeter of the Bethabara Dobb's Parish Cemetery, and this feature too exhibited evidence of fencing in the form of postholes (Snavely 1985; Idol and Trage 1995:18-20). Partial excavation of the Dobb's Parish berm showed a continuous berm/non-berm stratigraphic contour, indicating that the feature was not intentionally created by piling up earth and packing it. Features of this kind are likely created by previous plowing or animal traction on either side of the fence/property line, and the presence of post and wire fences suggests a twentieth century origin. Stones found along the berm are probably the consequence of past field or pasture clearing. Herman Stoltz (personal communication, 1996) relates that part of this property was in pasture in the early part of the century, and the fence(s) then would have served to constrain livestock. It should be recognized however that modern fence/property boundaries may be continuations of prior boundaries, and that the berm may have been formed prior to the twentieth century.

Archeological Remains of the Stauber House (31Fy1031**)

The survey encountered evidence of a previously existing structure in the southwestern portion of the project area tract nearest Loesch's Lane and behind a standing twentieth century house and yard area. The debris is reportedly the remains of the Stauber House, built during the late nineteenth century, and burned between 1936 and 1938 (Michael Hartley, personal communication 1996; Herman and Peggy Stoltz, personal communication 1996). Evidence for the existence of this house was in the form of abundant scatters of brick, brick fragments, stones and stone slabs, mortar and concrete. Test pits in this area generally produced abundant historic period artifacts. Most of the structure's construction materials had been redeposited, and the area was in heavy undergrowth at the time of survey. The only observed in situ remains were a large (4.2 x 1.8 meter) concentration of large, flat, stone slabs which lay .03 - .10 m beneath the surface and a one-inch iron pipe which was encountered in a test pit and wasvisible on the surface at the western boundary of the project area. Above ground construction debris occurred throughout an approximately 40 x 50 meter area. A large block of redeposited but intact brick and mortar was encountered in a test pit at 10 - 19 cm below surface approximately 8.5 meters away from the large stone slab area. Enlargement of the test pit revealed that the fragment was not an undisturbed structural feature. Three small piles of brick, mortar, stones, and concrete were observed. One of these was adjacent to the stone slab-lined area and a large maple tree, which grew out of the slab-lined area. The stone slabs (granite and other igneous rock) were generally flat and broken rather than cut. A few centimeters of soil lay between adjacent stones, and no stones or other construction material underlay the visible stones. The stones apparently represent an old pathway or yard area originally associated with the house and disturbed by the growth of the maple tree. Bethania's Main Street sidewalks are composed primarily of fieldstone slabs surrounding large maple trees (Little-Stokes 1975:3). It is possible that the Stauber House builders wished to duplicate this architectural feature on their property in some manner. If the house faced south, the maple tree may have been located in the front yard. Artifacts recovered from test pits and the ground surface within a 70 meter radius of the visible structural debris included construction related materials such as brick, window pane, and nails, and domestic items such as potsherds and glass jar fragments (Figure 7). Both cut and wire nails and nail fragments of various design and sizes were present. At least one nail is either a wrought nail or an early cut (pre-1830) variety (following Nelson 1968). Ceramic artifacts included nineteenth century glazed redware sherds and nineteenth and twentieth century tableware, including Staffordshire and Allerton "Willow ware." Twentieth century artifacts included a plastic comb, coat button, and a telephone receiver as well as wire nails. Besides nails, other hardware at the site included two rusted door hinges. Three red ceramic tile drainpipes, each one foot long, were present on the surface near the structural ruins on the western border of the project area, as well as a large metal fragment of a wood-burning stove. Small fragments of calcined and unburned animal bone (large, non-human mammal) were present in a number of test pits within a 50 meter radius of the structure area. These were too fragmentary to be identified according to species (Bill Terrell, personal communication 1996). The locations of the house privy and well were not found during the survey. These may have been filled in or covered over after the destruction of the house, or evidence may lie undetected in the dense undergrowth which covers a portion of the house area, despite frequent crossings of this area by the survey crew. It is uncertain when the Stauber House was built, although structural evidence and other artifacts recovered from the area do not contradict a late nineteenth century date estimation. It is not known if the original house occupants constructed outbuildings of any type within the survey area. According to local informants, the house was of wooden frame construction, possessed a brick chimney, and faced south (towards Loesch's Lane, formerly the Old Richmond Road). A porch was located on the house's east side. A survey of house structures listed on the amended National Register Nomination built during the last two decades of the nineteenth century shows that many were of wooden frame and weatherboard construction (e.g. the Rufus Transou House). Because no listing for a Stauber appears on the Bethania Township Agricultural or Population schedule for 1870 (Forsyth County 1870 Census), it appears that the house was constructed after that date. A record search in the county deeds office failed to trace the property to the original deed, but did suggest that the land was probably owned by one L.E. or W.E. Stauber and his wife, Jessie B. Stauber. After a period in which the house was vacant, a non-Moravian named Greer (Grier?) Gray acquired or rented the house and property in the early 1930's. The house was subsequently remodeled. In addition to the house a small barn for pigeons was located nearby and a larger barn for livestock was located approximately 100 meters away to the northeast (Herman Stoltz, personal communication 1996). Goats, horses, and mules were maintained on the Gray property. The house burned between 1936 - 1938, but the brick chimney stood for some period after the house's destruction (Herman and Peggy Stoltz, personal communication 1996). The iron pipe probably dates to the early 1930's when the community acquired electricity and running water. No clear evidence of the house's destruction by burning was observed by the survey. Although a few brick fragments were charred, this could be simply the result of their position on the chimney's interior. A few (3) glass fragments recovered from a test pit in the vicinity appear to have been transformed by heat, and there is the single occurrence of a lump of melted lead. A few small flecks of charcoal were encountered from test pits and from the surface of the area, but there was no large surface or subsurface deposits of charred material. It should be remembered that dense undergrowth over a large portion of the debris scatter hindered the survey effort. Further evidence on the ground surface may remain undetected.

Summary and Recommendations

Two historic components within the project area are potentially eligible for preservation as possible contributing resources to the Bethania Historic District, and are discussed below. Although test pits in the middle of the survey block and in the eastern smaller block contained nineteenth and twentieth century artifacts, it is unlikely that these areas possess subsurface structural remains or other undisturbed cultural deposits or features. Because of the apparent lack of these contextual associations, and because of the proximity of the artifact scatter to Bethania's Main Street and the consequential exposure to 200 years of casual disposal of refuse, this area was not assigned a state site number. The area does not appear to be a potential contributing resource, and no additional work is recommended to assess its potential. Two cultural features in the corridor fronting Main Street, in the form of low berms representing old boundary demarcations and twentieth century fence lines are potential contributing resources, since these may be continuations of old upland lot property boundaries (see above) and therefore would be a significant element of the landscape. These boundaries do not appear to correspond with the original upland lots as laid out by Reuter. This feature type has been previously investigated in Forsyth County (see above), and the results of those studies indicate that little in the way of new information is expected to be gained from them using archeological methods. The late nineteenth century Stauber House may be a potential contributing resource to the Historic District of Bethania. The standing structure was destroyed before WWII, and redeposited construction debris, domestic artifacts, and associated domestic hardware cover the former house area. Intact subsurface remains of an apparent stone slab pathway or yard area and an iron pipe associated with the house were documented by the survey. Further testing is required to determine if any other subsurface cultural features remain intact. If additional undisturbed subsurface structural remains or other cultural deposits exist, for example the holes for the cellar, privy, or well, these features and associated artifacts could yield new information about Bethania community development in the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, especially in regard to economic and social relationships of individuals within the community and also with individuals and industries outside Bethania. For example, the rate and pattern of innovation adoption in other contemporary Moravian town lots could be compared with that of Bethania in terms of modernization processes of agrarian communities (see Eighmy 1981:34-36, 47). Further testing is necessary to assess the potential of the archeological remains of the Stauber House as a potential contributing cultural resource. In the absence of further archeological work at the site, it is recommended that the Stauber House area remain undisturbed by heavy earth moving and other construction activities. We further advise consultation between the Developer, the City and County Planning Board of Forsyth County, and the State Historic Preservation Officer, in regard to necessary steps for mitigation of adverse affect.

References Cited

Abbott, Lawrence E., Jr. 1984a An Archeological Survey of the HDR/Tobaccoville Interceptor: Site Locational Analysis Along Minor Upland Streams, Forsyth County, North Carolina. Report on file, Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories, Winston-Salem. 1984b An Archeological Survey of Lower Muddy Creek, Davidson and Forsyth counties, North Carolina. Manuscript on file, Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories, Winston-Salem. 1987 Excavations in the South Fork Creek Valley: A Test for Deeply Buried Sites Within the Floodplain of a Small, Upland Stream. Manuscript on file, Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories, Winston-Salem. Beckerman, Ira Carl 1986 Prehistoric Settlement and Subsistence in Piedmont, North Carolina. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University. Claggett, Stephen R. and John S. Cable 1982 The Haw River Sites: Archaeological Investigations at Two Stratified Sites in the North Carolina Piedmont. Report by Commonwealth Associates to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District. Clauser, John W., Jr. 1978 The Excavation of the Bethabara Pottery Kiln: An Analysis of Nineteenth Century Pottery Techniques. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville. 1988 Excavations in the Bethabara Community Garden. Historic Bethabara Park, Winston-Salem. 1994 Test Excavations at the Bethabara Brewers House. Report on file, Historic Bethabara Park, Winston-Salem. Coe, Joffre L. 1964 The Formative Cultures of the North Carolina Piedmont. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 54(5). Davis, John D. 1987 Early Woodland of the North Carolina Piedmont: New Information from the E. Davis Site. Paper presented at 44th Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Charleston, South Carolina. Davis, John D. and Rhea Rogers Marshall 1988 An Archeological Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Portions of the Muddy Creek Basin of Forsyth County, North Carolina. Manuscript on file, Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories, Winston-Salem. Eighmy, Jeffrey L. 1981 The Use of Material Culture in Diachronic Anthropology. In Modern Material Culture, edited by Richard A. Gould and Michael B. Schiffer, pp.31-49. Academic Press, New York. Eller, Ernest McNeill 1959 Bethania in Wachovia: 1759-1959. Bradford, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Fries, Adelaide, Stuart Thurman Wright and J. Edwin Hendricks 1976 Forsyth: The History of a County on the March. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Hamilton, Kenneth G. (editor) 1969 Records of the Moravians in North Carolina, vol. XI. State Department of Archives and History, Raleigh. Hartley, Michael O. 1987 Wachovia in Forsyth. Old Salem, Inc., Winston-Salem. Hartley, Michael O., Martha B. Boxley and Gwynne S. Taylor 1990 Bethania National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. Document on file, United States Department of the Interior. Idol, Bruce S. and Stephen T. Trage 1995 Excavations at the Dobb's Parish Cemetery and Bethabara Stranger's Graveyard, Forsyth County, North Carolina. Report on file, Historic Bethabara Park, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Keller, John E. 1989 Further Investigations Along the Bethabara Bypass: Archeological Data Recovery at the Speas Road and Pavement Sites, Forsyth County, North Carolina. Manuscript on file, Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories, Winston-Salem. Joy, Deborah 1993 Archaeological Monitoring on Loesch Lane in the Bethania National Register Historic District, Forsyth County, North Carolina. Report on file, North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways Planning and Environmental Branch, Raleigh, North Carolina. Little-Stokes, Ruth 1975 Bethania National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form. Report on file, North Carolina Division of Archives and History, Raleigh. Meltzer, David J. and Bruce D. Smith 1986 Paleoindian and Early Archaic Subsistence Strategies in Eastern North America. In Foraging, Collecting, and Harvesting: Archaic Period Subsistence and Settlement in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Sarah W. Neusius, pp.3-31. Occasional Paper No. 6. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. Nelson, Lee H. 1968 Nail Chronology as an Aid to Dating Old Buildings. American Association for State and Local History Technical Leaflet 48. History News 24 (11). North Carolina Department of Transportation 1990 Bethania Traffic Study Report. North Carolina Department of Transportation and the City County Planning Board of Winston-Salem/Forsyth County. Russell, S. Gayle 1982 An Archeological Survey of Muddy, Silas, Little, and South Fork Creeks. Manuscript on file, Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories, Winston-Salem. Shirley, Michael 1994 From Congregation Town to Industrial City: Culture and Social Change in a Southern Community. New York University Press, New York. Smith, Bruce D. (editor) 1992 Rivers of Change: Essays on Early Agriculture in Eastern North America. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Snavely, Alan N. 1985 Dobb's Parish Graveyard/Bethabara Mill Dam: Archaeological Investigations at Historic Bethabara, Forsyth County, North Carolina. Manuscript on file, Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. South, Stanley 1972 Discovery in Wachovia. Manuscript on file, Old Salem, Inc. Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Taylor, Gwynne Stephens 1981 From Frontier to Factory: An Architectural History of Forsyth County. North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives and History, Raleigh. Thorp, Daniel B. 1986 Assimilation in North Carolina's Moravian Community. The Journal of Southern History 52(1):19-42. 1989 The Moravian Community in Colonial North Carolina: Pluralism on the Southern Frontier. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. Ward, H. Trawick 1976 A Survey of Four Wastewater treatment Plant Areas in the Winston-Salem area (Forsyth, Davidson, Guilford, and Stanly Counties). Report on file, Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh. Webb, Paul A. 1994 Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of a Proposed Construction and Demolition Landfill Site, Forsyth County, North Carolina. Report on file, Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh. Willis, Raymond F. and R. Jackson Marshall III 1988 Archeological Survey of the Proposed Historic Bethabara Bypass Corridor, Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina. Report on file, Wake Forest University Archeology Laboratories, Winston-Salem. Woodall, J. Ned 1975 Second Archeological Survey of the Great Bend Area, Yadkin River Valley, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Office of State Archeology, Raleigh. Woodall, J. Ned and Stephen R. Claggett 1974 An Archeological Survey of the Great Bend Area, Yadkin River Valley, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh. Zimmerman, James L. 1976 Soil Survey of Forsyth County, North Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.

Appendix: Artifact Inventory

Provenience: Easement and entrance along Main Street, Bethania, NC Transect A TP A-1: 3 redware sherds (1 with red/brown glaze) TP A-1/E10: 2 glass windowpane fragments 1 redware sherd (red/brown glaze) 1 earthenware rim fragment (white glaze) 1 stoneware sherd (salt glazed; gray/green exterior, brown interior) TP A-1/W10: 2 brick fragments 1 redware sherd (unglazed; possible trivet part) TP A-3: 2 redware sherds (red glazed exterior, olive green glaze with brown/red slip interior; everted profile, probable bowl fragment) TP A-3/S10: 1 glazed white earthenware sherd TP A-3/S10,E10:1 glass windowpane fragment 1 unidentified ceramic sherd (historic) Transect B TP B-2: 1 white glazed earthenware rim sherd; pointed lip with undulating form) _________________________________________________________________ Provenience: Low lying area; Loesch's Lane to Stauber House area Transect C TP C-1: 1 clear glass jar bottle fragment 1 glass windowpane fragment 1 brick fragment 2 glazed white earthenware sherds 1 redware sherd (glazed with black slip) 1 earthenware rim sherd (black slip; everted profile) TP C-2: 2 coal pieces 12 unidentified metal fragments 1 nail head (unident.) 3 redware sherds 1 redware sherd (black glaze) 1 glazed white earthenware sherd 2 glazed off-white earthenware sherds 1 bone fragment (calcined; unident.) TP C-3: 1 wire nail (2.5 in.) 2 wire nail fragments 2 cut nails-one poss. wrought (2.1 - 2.5 in.) 3 cut nail fragments 2 nail fragments (unident.) 1 clear glass jar fragment 1 glass windowpane fragment 2 coal pieces 1 earthenware sherd (possibly glazed; hand- painted green floral pattern) 2 glazed white earthenware sherds 2 brick fragments 7 redware sherds (glazed) 3 redware sherds (eroded) 2 redware rimsherds (glazed; everted, rolled lips with flat extended surface) TP C-4: 2 clear glass windowpane fragments 2 clear glass bottle/jar fragments 1 clear glass handle or bottle neck 6 coal pieces (combusted) 1 wire nail (1.5 in.) 2 wire nail fragments 1 hardened clay fragment 1 unidentified metal fragment 2 glazed white earthenware sherds 3 redware sherds (glazed; one vessel base/foot) 1 ceramic sherd (lead glaze; purple on white transfer print; possible Staffordshire) TP C-6: 3 brick fragments TP C-10: 3 redware sherds (glazed) Transect D TP D-1: 5 brick or fired ceramic paste fragments 2 clear glass windowpane fragments 1 green bottle glass fragment 1 clear glass fragment 2 nail fragments 3 glazed white earthenware sherds 3 redware sherds (glazed) 1 bone or shell fragment (calcined) TP D-2: 1 clear glass bottle or cup fragment 2 clear glass windowpane fragments 3 nail fragments 2 cut nail fragments 1 unidentified metal fragment 1 quartz chip (possible flake) 2 brick fragments 1 redware sherd (glazed) 1 redware sherd (eroded) 2 fired clay fragments 3 bone fragments (calcined) 1 charred seed (possibly corn) 1 stoneware rim sherd (salt glaze; grey interior, green/grey exterior) 1 unidentified mineral chunk TP D-2,surface:2 brick fragments 1 misc. grooved stone 1 grooved earthenware sherd (red; flower pot?) 1 ceramic rim sherd (lead glaze; flow blue transfer print; small cup or bowl) 9 glazed white earthenware sherds 2 glazed off-white earthenware sherds (part of bowl or plate) TP D-3: 2 pieces brown plastic comb (with "Made in USA" embossed) 1 redware sherd (eroded) 2 brick fragments TP D-4: 2 cut nails (length-2.5 and approx. 2.3 inches) 1 wire nail fragment 1 misc. u.i.d. metal fragment 1 clear glass windowpane fragment 1 pink plastic comb fragment 4 sherds glazed redware (3 body, 1 rim) 1 animal bone fragment Transect E TP E-1: 9 brick and/or fired clay chunks 1 gray round plastic button, no thread holes 2 clear glass bottle/jar fragments 1 cut nail fragment 1 mass melted? metal, poss. lead 5 small white plaster? pieces 1 glazed white earthenware sherd 1 blue on white transfer print lead-glazed earthenware sherd 1 glazed off-white porcellanous sherdlet TP E-2: 13 small brick fragments 8 coal fragments (1 combusted, 7 hard) 1 amber bottle glass fragment 3 clear glass windowpane fragments 1 clear glass fragment 2 glazed redware sherds 1 glazed off-white earthenware sherd 1 glazed white porcellanous sherdlet 1 glazed blue on white transfer print earthenware sherd (Willow ware pattern, bowl or cup) 1 off-white and blue glazed stoneware rimsherd (thick walled bowl fragment) 1 light green tinted bottle/jar glass fragment 5 u.i.d. nail fragments 1 u.i.d. nail, length- 1.5 inches Surface between TP E-1 and E-2: 1 door hinge (almost fully open, 3.4 x 3.4 inches) TP E-3: 2 emerald green bottle glass fragments 1 eroded redware sherd 1 glazed redware sherd 2 brick and/or fired clay fragments 3 glazed white earthenware sherds 1 glazed off-white earthenware sherdlet 1 cut nail, length-approx. 3 inches 1 wire nail, length- approx. 3 inches 2 u.i.d. nail fragments 1 u.i.d. non-human animal bone fragment TP E-3/S10: 2 brick fragments, small 1 clear bottle glass fragment 1 small chunk coal 1 u.i.d. nail fragment 2 u.i.d. mineral chunks 2 eroded redware sherds 1 glazed redware sherd 1 glazed white earthenware sherd 1 u.i.d. animal bone fragment TP E-3/W10: 1 glazed redware sherd 1 clear bottle glass fragment TP E-5: 1 wire nail fragment Transect F TP F-2: 11 brick fragments 4 clear glass fragments, poss. exposed to heat 1 aqua blue bottle glass (thick) fragment 2 u.i.d. nail fragments (not wire) 1 rimsherd glazed blue on white transfer print earthenware "Willow ware" pattern sherd, (bowl or plate) 1 glazed white earthenware sherd 1 u.i.d. porcelain fragment, poss. portion of doll limb, or part of ceramic vessel, or portion of pipe stem. TP F-3: 1 u.i.d. nail fragment (prob. cut) 1 brick fragment-small 1 glazed redware sherd 1 glazed white earthenware sherd TP F-4: 1 eroded redware sherd Surface finds in structure area: 3 sherds (1 body, 2 rim) glazed blue on white transfer print earthenware "Willow ware" pattern. * One sherd has portion of maker's mark- Staffordshire. One sherd is nearly porcellanous. Artifacts found with stone slabs: 1 wire nail, length- 4.1 inches 1 plastic telephone mouthpiece/receiver 1 green bottle glass fragment 1 u.i.d. metal implement (poss. portion of shovel handle, cut nails hold two oblong (10 1/4th inch pieces together). Artifacts collected from rubble piles and eroded bank area near Stauber House ruins: 1 clear glass bottle rim and neck fragment, single external thread, mold mark extends to vessel lip 1 u.i.d. metal "rail" fragment 1 large fragment metal wood-burning stove 1 glazed blue stoneware rimsherd, large platter 1 glazed blue on white transfer print semi-porcellanous sherd, Willow pattern, cup or bowl 1 red tile drainpipe, 1' x 4.5"


Library Index