Test Excavations at the
Crater Site, 31WK155
Wilkes County, North Carolina

by
J. Ned Woodall

Archeology Laboratories
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina USA

March, 1995

Table of Contents

  1. Abstract
  2. Acknowledgements
  3. Background
    1. Site location
    2. Geology
    3. History
  4. Excavations
    1. Methods
    2. Stratigraphy
    3. Features
  5. Artifacts
    1. Pottery
    2. Lithics
    3. Tools
  6. Summary and Conclusion
  7. References Cited

Abstract

Excavations at the Crater Site (31 WK 155) in the summer of 1994 were conducted by the Archeology Laboratories of Wake Forest University. Sixteen 2m squares were excavated by hand, and several shovel tests and auger borings also were done to test for buried remnants of the site. The work indicated that the Crater Site belongs to the late Woodland, and much of it has been disturbed by cultivation. Other than a few postholes concentrated within a relatively small area no subsurface features were found. The site does not appear eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.

Acknowledgements

The field work at the Crater Site was done by participants in the 1994 field school in archeological methods. I would like to thank the students involved for their infectious enthusiasm, good humor, and especially their careful and commendable efforts to retrieve as much information as the site would allow. Participants were Eric Biederbeck, Bill Duncan, Elaine Griesheimer, Bruce Idol, Karen Sell and Karen White. Our work at the site was made possible by the cooperation of the landowner, Jim Crater, and the helpful services of the Ronda town manager, Judy Anthony. My thanks also go to the citizens of Ronda who showed us their kind hospitality and willingness to help in the inevitable minor problems that arise in a project of this sort.

Background

The Crater Site was discovered in 1991 in the course of an archeological survey of the Yadkin River floodplain between Elkin and Roaring River (Rogers and Woodall 1992: 18). In 1992 a survey was commissioned by the town of Ronda as part of the planning process of a wastewater treatment facility designed to serve the community. Along with a number of newly discovered sites the Crater Site was re-surveyed at that time (Woodall 1992). The 1992 work included the use of shovel tests and backhoe trenches and those subsurface tests, along with the surface indications of a late Woodland occupation, suggested that a substantial and possibly well-preserved archeological site was present. As part of the management recommendations for the town of Ronda it was recommended that the Crater Site be more thoroughly examined in order to determine its eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places. In the summer of 1994 the Archeology Laboratories continued its research program on the Woodland cultures of the upper Yadkin Valley. Because the Crater Site seemed to fit our research needs, and because testing of the site would benefit the town of Ronda, an agreement was reached between the site's landowner, the town of Ronda and the Wake Forest field party. In return for convenient housing for the field party and other amenities, Wake Forest agreed to conduct the necessary testing of the site. That work was completed in three weeks, during late June and early July of 1994.

Site location

Immediately southeast of the town of Ronda is a broad elliptical floodplain created by the Yadkin River bending to the south. The floodplain is bisected by Hughes Branch; the Crater Site is located in the western half of the floodplain, between Hughes Branch and state road 2303 which crosses the Yadkin River here (Figure 1). When originally surveyed in 1991 the site appeared to be confined to the riverine portion of the floodplain, along the crest and slopes of the low remnants of a natural levee. The 1992 survey identified cultural materials (primarily fire-cracked rock) over a much larger area, including portions of the backswamp currently drained by a narrow ditch extending from state road 2303 to Hughes Branch. In the summer of 1994 the original assessment was found more accurate, with the bulk of surface artifacts present in an oval scatter 170m by 50m, the long axis paralleling the river course. In the autumn of 1994, after the corn crop had been harvested and the entire floodplain was clear of crop cover, the area was surveyed twice again, and once more the surface materials were concentrated near the river. Thus, the site boundaries as given in the original survey report for the town of Ronda (Woodall 1992:Fig.1) overestimate the horizontal surface distribution of the site.

Geology

The geological setting of the Crater Site is discussed fully in the survey report issued earlier (Woodall 1992). To summarize, the floodplain containing the site is composed of Holocene alluvium deposited by the Yadkin River, primarily Buncombe sandy loam. This friable sandy soil yields to Congaree silt loam in the northern portion of the floodplain, away from the river in the poorly drained backswamp. The site itself occurs near the river on a low rise of loose sandy loam. It is important to note that the topography of the floodplain is not similar to that observed downstream in Yadkin and Surry counties. In those counties the floodplains, especially the larger ones, exhibit the classic surface profile of a well-defined natural levee paralleling the river course; the levee declines more or less gradually as one moves away from the river, through the backswamp, until the surrounding residual soils of the steep bordering uplands are reached. In the Ronda floodplain, in contrast, the area between the backswamp and the river shows an undulating surface with a weakly defined natural levee, and the levee itself is interrupted by declivities formed at oblique angles to the river. As was suspected in our original survey (Woodall 1992:3,9) and confirmed by the excavations reported here, the floodplain has been subjected to recent periodic episodes of aggradation and degradation created by overbank flooding. This has affected the integrity of the site, and may have been influential in selection of settlement locations in prehistory. Above the town of Ronda the Yadkin River receives several large tributaries that drain the southeast-facing flanks of the Blue Ridge Mountains. These tributaries are quite short (the mountains are easily visible from the Yadkin) and most are deeply incised. In consequence they are prone to rapid rises when storm systems from the Atlantic or Gulf of Mexico slide along the Blue Ridge front and deposit heavy rains from orthographic lifting. The runoff is channeled into the Yadkin, and the sudden infusion of water causes the river to rise rapidly and overflow its banks, often with disastrous results. (It was to control such flooding that the Kerr Reservoir was constructed a few miles above Ronda in the 1960's.) During the 1994 field work several residents of the area recounted in vivid detail the ferocity of the 1916 and 1940 floods on the town and its surrounds, including the floodplain containing the Crater Site.

History

The history of Ronda and its vicinity is reviewed in the survey report (Woodall 1992). For the floodplain containing the Crater Site, local informants indicate that it has been under cultivation for at least 100 years. The only exception to that use is the reported construction of a small-scale pottery industry immediately north of the site in the backswamp of the floodplain. According to local informants a building once was present here, and a small pond that lies adjacent to the site's access road is a result of quarrying for clay. During the field season a systematic survey of this sector of the floodplain was conducted, and yielded only a dozen small fragments of brick and a tiny glass sherd. It was said that the building that once was present was swept away by a flood in the first half of this century.

Excavations

Methods

Prior to excavation a datum was set inside the tree line bordering the river course. The datum is a metal rod with the arbitrary horizontal coordinates N2E100. All excavation units are keyed to this datum and bear a N and E coordinate, indicating the southeast corner of the square. The excavations concentrated on the low levee crest north of the datum, and then extended in a northern line to almost bisect the Buncombe loamy sands of the riverine portion of the floodplain (Fig. 1). Altogether 16 squares were excavated, each 2m by 2m, although several were clustered to ultimately form two four-meter squares separated by a 1m wide wheelbarrow path (Fig. 1). For each square the plow zone, usually about 30cm thick, was removed and discarded without screening. Excavation below this proceeded by 15cm levels, adjusted in certain squares to accommodate cultural stratigraphy. All fill below the plow zone was passed through quarter-inch mesh. Feature fill was troweled and retained for flotation; this soil was processed at the field camp, passed through one-eighth screen and then permeable cloth. Photographs were taken of each level of each square, and profiles were drawn to scale and photographed of at least one side of each square. Written records were kept of each square's excavation, along with standardized data forms for each level and/or feature excavated. All artifacts were washed, sorted and cataloged in the field camp, and they, along with attendant documentation, are permanently curated at the Archeology Laboratories of Wake Forest University.

Stratigraphy

The stratigraphy at the Crater Site consists of three, sometimes four levels distinguished by texture, color and artifact content. In the several units closest to the river, i.e. excavation units (E.U.s) 1-8,and 16, these are a 25-35cm thick plow zone of loose yellow-brown sandy loam with occasional artifacts; a dark brown, almost black clayey sand with artifacts, usually 10- 15cm thick, and a sterile compact yellow-brown sandy clay below extending to an undetermined depth. In excavating these squares the plow zone was removed, the dark stratum (referred to as the midden zone in the field notes) removed as a unit, and then a 15cm level excavated below into the sterile soil. This removal of part of the sterile soil allowed any features present to be easily observed, mapped and excavated separately. These consisted of several postholes, described below. As our line of squares extended farther to the north the stratigraphy changed, and the new sequence was particularly evident in E.U.s 11-16. Here the modern plow zone is again 20-30cm thick, consisting of a rather friable yellow-brown sandy loam. Beneath this is a thin zone of coarse laminated sand, varying in thickness from 2-10cm. Under this is a darker brown clayey sand 10-15cm thick with occasional artifacts, and under this is a very dark brown clayey sand containing artifacts and resting on a compact yellow-brown sandy clay. This sequence can be seen in Fig. 2a. The deepest zone, the sterile yellow-brown sandy clay, extends to an unknown depth; in E.U. 11 a deep test was made, with excavation in a 1m by 1m square extended to 106cm below surface, then an auger boring to slightly over 2m below surface--no artifacts, charcoal or even river pebbles were recovered from the homogenous deposits, which steadily increased in moisture content. The artifact-bearing stratum clearly represents an old soil horizon which was the land surface at the time of the site occupation. This was subsequently buried and then plowed, and the darker brown clayey sand then represents an old plow zone, probably created by animal traction as judged from its thickness. The underlying darker soil has, at the interface of the two, scars left by the plow and, in E.U. 15, a badly rusted piece of iron was present at the interface. This old plow zone itself was buried under at least 30-40cm of alluvium. When plowing began again after that flooding episode, the lower portion of the new alluvium was not affected, leaving the laminated coarse sands undisturbed. This sequence was not seen in E.U.s 1-10 because here, on the crest of the levee remnant near the river, soil deposition was less during the later flooding episode and failed to bury the artifact-bearing soil as deeply. This burial of the cultural stratum probably explains the occurrence of surface materials mainly on the riverine portion of the floodplain; away from the river the site lies underneath the modern plow zone. Because of its burial under recent alluvium the boundaries of the Crater Site are difficult to estimate. Our excavation units were augmented with shovel tests and auger borings, 26 in all, with shovel tests to 50cm below surface and auger borings to 1m. These were concentrated along the eastern and western periphery of the floodplain between Hughes Branch and state road 2003, and none produced artifacts, charcoal or even the markedly darker soils which contained cultural materials in our controlled excavation units. Particularly evident along the western portion of the bottom are thick deposits of coarse laminated sands below the modern plow zone, indicating high energy alluviation processes there, corresponding to the stratigraphy seen in our more northerly excavation units.

Features

Features at the Crater Site were found only in those excavation units near the river. These consisted of postholes and a circular area of red clay lying just beneath the plow zone, 60cm in diameter and containing tiny bits of burned bone. This feature, found in the center of E.U.16, was only 3-5cm thick, and probably represents a short-term hearth area--the soil was not hardened by the fire, and unfortunately no charcoal was present. Twenty-five postholes were found below the dark stratum in E.U.s clustered near the river, on the levee crest. All but one were in the two four-meter square blocks created by contiguous 2m squares, and this is the only portion of the excavated site that produced any sign of subsurface occupational features. Figure 2b shows three of these postholes near the northeast corner of E.U. 4. The postholes were identified as such based on size and shape--each was either troweled of its darker fill or vertically sectioned. All were vertical or nearly so, and terminated between 56 and 80cm below surface. Artifacts and bits of charcoal were found in most of the postholes, and several contained complete or broken river cobbles either in the posthole stain or immediately adjacent to the stain. These stones are interpreted as wedges to secure the post; one such stone can be seen in Fig. 2b. Despite our best efforts, no unambiguous pattern was created by the exposed postholes. It seems unlikely that they represent a house. Although as many as six postholes could be seen in a linear array, covering a distance of 2.5m, the line of posts did not continue beyond this. Most postholes seems to be rather randomly placed, but interestingly they did form loose clusters which indicate they likely were part of integrated structures. Those structures may have been drying racks or small crude temporary shelters (perhaps lean-tos). Although flotation of the fill of the postholes yielded flecks of charcoal from each, only one produced large pieces of charcoal suitable for conventional radiocarbon dating (Table I).

Table I: Radiocarbon Date from Posthole 16-3, 31WK155

Lab Number Uncorrected Calibrated Comments Radiocarbon Range Age B.P (2 sigma) Beta-78598 1050+/-90 BP AD 790-1195 Small sample (< 1 g C) Note: Dates calibrated with the program CALIB 3.0.1 (Stuiver and Reimer 1993). Intercept with calibration curve: AD 1000.

Artifacts

Artifacts from the Crater Site consist of potsherds, lithics (stone tools and debitage, or wastage from their manufacture) and fire-cracked rock. Non-artifactual materials normally recovered from riverine late Woodland sites such as mussel shell and animal bone are absent, apart from a few minuscule bits of burned bone. Even charcoal, normally found frequently in most Woodland site excavations, was unusually rare at the Crater Site.

Pottery

A total of 820 potsherds was found on the surface and in the excavations at the Crater Site. A portion of these were not useful for examination of surface treatment due to their small size or eroded surfaces, and are listed as Unclassified in Table II. As seen in Table II, the assemblage is dominated by plain and net- impressed surfaces. Almost without exception the ratios of the various surface treatments identified were consistent in the vertical units of the excavations, implying that the favored method of ceramic production did not change, at least in regard to surface treatment.The great majority of the Crater Site sherds are between 4mm-8mm in thickness. Testing a relationship between surface treatment and thickness, those over 8mm thick were subject to separate surface treatment analysis. For these thicker specimens, the predominant surface treatment was net-impressing (44 vs. 11 plain--10 could not be classified). Despite the suggested relationship between vessel thickness and surface treatment, the thick sherds were evenly distributed between the midden and the plow zone. Using the ceramics from E.U.s 1-7 as a sample, 162 sherds were analyzed in regard to temper and surface treatment. Tempering agents were, in descending order of occurrence, crushed quartz (50.5%), sand (34.5%) and soapstone (15%). Of the sample selected, 110 sherds were undamaged and large enough for observation of surface treatment. Using the four more common surface treatments (plain, net-impressed, fabric-impressed and brushed), a chi-square analysis was done of the relationship between surface treatment and tempering agent. The contingency table thus created, with 6 degrees of freedom, yielded X=10.198, significant at the .05 level. Examination of the table shows a weak tendency for the soapstone temper to be associated with plain surface treatment.

Lithics

Lithic materials were not abundant at the Crater Site. A total of 1174 pieces of debitage were found in the excavations, consisting entirely of flakes. Table III lists the flakes from each excavation unit and level, broken down into primary (more than half of the dorsal surface covered with cortex), secondary (some cortex but less than half the dorsal surface covered) and tertiary flakes (no cortex evident). Tertiary flakes were dominant, indicating that tool finishing/refurbishing rather than initial manufacture from cobble cores was the primary producer of the materials. It is evident from Table III that the lithic materials are contained in the midden and, where the midden has been plowed, in the modern plow zone and surface. Of greater interest is the unusual abundance of debitage in E.U. 3. This is not matched by an abundance of potsherds in that unit, which suggests that stone tool processing was especially emphasized here. More importantly it shows that the site has not been severely disturbed and sorted by erosion, in turn supporting the interpretation offered here that the absence of features, charcoal concentrations, animal bone and other common constituents of Woodland sites is not due to natural transformations. The debitage also was studied in regard to raw material, using the classes felsite (various metamorphosed volcanics including rhyolite, andesite, and argillite), chert, quartz and jasper. Totals for the site are felsite=68% (by weight), chert=9%, quartz=21% and jasper=2%. The debitage from E.U. 3, mentioned above, is 98% felsite of similar composition, supporting the hypothesis that this lithic debris is primary refuse. The chert found is the black glossy material commonly known as Knox chert, probably originating in southwest Virginia or eastern Tennessee. The felsite and chert (and probably the jasper) are imported to the site from some distance. The white quartz found may have come from the quartz quarry site discovered by the original Ronda survey. The quarry yielded a Woodland projectile point and thus was in use during that time period, and it is situated less than a kilometer north of the Crater Site. Despite the proximity of a quarry producing white quartz of unusually high quality that material is represented by only 21% of the Crater Site debitage.

Tools

A total of 29 stone tools, complete and fragmentary, were found during the 1994 excavations. The majority (23) are projectile points, and at least two others likely are the distal tips of points. Only one Archaic point was present, with the remainder consisting of Woodland triangular or stemmed (type Randolph) arrow points. Table IV shows selected attributes and provenience of these specimens. Type designations are after Coe (1964). Interestingly, the Crater site yielded no retouched flakes other than those shown below, not even flakes with use retouch commonly found on Woodland sites of the region.

Summary and Conclusion

The Crater Site, 31WK155, is a Woodland riverine settlement on the alluvial bottomlands of the Yadkin River. Dating ca. A.D. 1000, it is unusual in the restricted range of artifact classes, the near-total absence of non-artifactual debris such as bone, mussel shell and charcoal, and the scarcity of sub-surface features. Lower portions of the site have not been affected by post-depositional disturbances by flooding or plowing, and the restricted range of materials likely reflects a site use pattern distinct from other late Woodland sites previously reported. The presence of multiple post holes and a single hearth on the riverine edge of the site, coupled with an island in the Yadkin river at that point suggest that fish were being obtained here, the island offering an opportunity to easily obstruct one river channel by a weir. In the absence of other evidence however this is speculative. In regard to the culture history of the region the site indicates that the use of soapstone as a ceramic tempering agent likely began about A.D. 1000 and increased in popularity after that time. Also, the importation of lithic raw material from regions across the Blue Ridge front, as well as from the Carolina Slate Belt, was well established at that date. Both these observations should of course be considered somewhat tentative because they are based on a single radiocarbon date, but nothing in the artifact assemblage serves to dispute that date. The 1994 excavations, including the auger and shovel tests described above, do not indicate additional significant information could be obtained by further work at the site. It does not appear to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and thus does not seem to warrant further consideration in the planning process for the water treatment plant.

References Cited

Coe, Joffre L. 1964 Formative Cultures of the Carolina Piedmont. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 54, part 5. Rogers, Rhea J. and J. Ned Woodall 1992 An Archeological Survey in the Upper Yadkin River Valley, North Carolina. Report on file, Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh. Woodall, J. Ned 1992 An Archeological Inventory of the Town of Ronda Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Wilkes County, North Carolina. Report on file, Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh.

Library Index